What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Blog Article
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment over the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that whilst the crime of murder was proven, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for taking into consideration mitigating factors during sentencing.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're on the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion might be regarded, however, we are apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy issue on the approval from the competent authority.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of your accused hasn't been conducted however. In the instant case, now the accused tried to take advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture with the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity in the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated pics. In addition to, the images shown to the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity right until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos in the accused publically, either by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt within the proceedings of the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make sure that there isn't any opportunity to the witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the push or electronic media. Specified the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
The case addresses a range of issues together with, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation on the right to life.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any potential adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get crafted.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, within the same level.
The law as proven in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
The legislation of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
So, it had been held that the right to the healthy environment was part in the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and fourteen on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all these amenities and amenities that a person is entitled to take pleasure in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
10. Without touching the merits on the case of your issue of once-a-year increases while in the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, such annual increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to get made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because more info the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only finished Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are established by executive organizations based on statutes.